An Information Theoretic Measure of Judea Pearl's Identifiability and Causal Influence
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper, we define a new information theoretic measure that we call the “uprooted information”. We show that a necessary and sufficient condition for a probability P (s|do(t)) to be “identifiable” (in the sense of Pearl) in a graph G is that its uprooted information be non-negative for all models of the graph G. In this paper, we also give a new algorithm for deciding, for a Bayesian net that is semi-Markovian, whether a probability P (s|do(t)) is identifiable, and, if it is identifiable, for expressing it without allusions to confounding variables. Our algorithm is closely based on a previous algorithm by Tian and Pearl, but seems to correct a small flaw in theirs. In this paper, we also find a necessary and sufficient graphical condition for a probability P (s|do(t)) to be identifiable when t is a singleton set. So far, in the prior literature, it appears that only a sufficient graphical condition has been given for this. By “graphical” we mean that it is directly based on Judea Pearl’s 3 rules of do-calculus.
منابع مشابه
Causal Inference by Surrogate Experiments: z-Identifiability
We address the problem of estimating the effect of intervening on a set of variables X from experiments on a different set, Z, that is more accessible to manipulation. This problem, which we call z-identifiability, reduces to ordinary identifiability when Z = ∅ and, like the latter, can be given syntactic characterization using the do-calculus [Pearl, 1995; 2000]. We provide a graphical necessa...
متن کاملThe Structural Model and the Ranking Theoretic Approach to Causation: A Comparison
Large parts of Judea Pearl's very rich work lie outside philosophy; moreover, basically being a computer scientist, his natural interest was in computational efficiency, which, as such, is not a philosophical virtue. Still, the philosophical impact of Judea Pearl's work is tremendous and often immediate; for the philosopher of science and the formal epistemologist few writings are as relevant a...
متن کاملTesting Identifiability of Causal Effects
This paper concerns the probabilistic evalu ation of the effects of actions in the presence of unmeasured variables. We show that the identification of causal effect between a sin gleton variable X and a set of variables Y can be accomplished systematically, in time polynomial in the number of variables in the graph. When the causal effect is identifiable, a closed-form expression can be obta...
متن کاملResolving misunderstandings about belief functions. In Response to J. Pearl's Criticisms in "Reasoning with Belief Functions: an Analysis of Compatibility"
Judea Pearl has made an excellent presentation of many of the errors that pervade the belief function (BF) literature, some being put forward, even though Pearl knows their answer, for the mere purpose of provoking reactions. So it is a good opportunity for me to clarify the situation. I shall start with a summary of my interpretation of the use of BF to quantify someone's belief (called the tr...
متن کاملPearl's Calculus of Intervention Is Complete
This paper is concerned with graphical criteria that can be used to solve the problem of identifying casual effects from nonexperimental data in a causal Bayesian network structure, i.e., a directed acyclic graph that represents causal relationships. We first review Pearl’s work on this topic [Pearl, 1995], in which several useful graphical criteria are presented. Then we present a complete alg...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1307.5837 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013